Ecrimesa Group
  • EnglishEnglish
    • Deutsch Deutsch
    • Français Français
    • Español Español
  • Home
  • Company
    • About Us
    • History
    • Facilities
    • Quality
    • Commitments
    • Meet our team
  • Services
    • Investment Casting
    • MIM (Metal Injection Moulding)
    • Machining
    • Additive manufacturing
  • Industries
    • Automotive
    • Aeronautical
    • Health
    • Defense
    • Other sectors
  • Downloads
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Additive Manufacturing
  • Case studies of additive manufacturing with metals

Case studies of additive manufacturing with metals

by Ecrimesa Group / Thursday, 08 July 2021 / Published in Additive Manufacturing, Case Studies

Additive Manufacturing: comparison between studio system desktop metal, conventional filament and binder jetting printers

At Ecrimesa Group we have carried out in recent years an extensive benchmarking work on solutions and suppliers of 3D printers to implement this technology both in the manufacture of prototypes prior to the manufacture of the mold and to accelerate the MIM process through the study of prototypes of the final parts. Also, short series of parts with complex geometry are produced with Additive Manufacturing.
In this study process, case studies have been carried out with Desktop metal’s Studio System printer and Binder Jetting.
These are our conclusions.

STUDIO SYSTEM DESKTOP METAL PRINTER  

For a more precise evaluation of the quality that can be obtained with Desktop Metal’s Studio System printer, prototypes are printed in 17-4PH material with 3 different qualities and processed up to sintering to elaborate the analysis on metal parts.

PROTOTYPENOZZLELAYER HEIGHT
A250 μm0,05 mm
B400 μm0,15 mm
C400 μm0,3 mm
Studio System Desktop Metal Printer Prototype Measurements: Nozzles VS Layer Height
Measurments Prototypes Surface
Measurements of prototypes obtained: Nozzle and Layer Height (surface)
Measurements Prototypes Back
Measurements of prototypes obtained: Nozzle and Layer Height (back view)

Prototype A marks the most optimal surface quality that can be obtained with the machine, with 250µm nozzle and 0.05mm layer height, while prototype C reflects the least optimal quality of the machine, printed with standard 400µm nozzle and 0.3mm layer height. Prototype B reflects an intermediate quality between A and C. It is the most optimal quality that the standard 400µm nozzle can print.

The properties obtained after debanding and sintering are shown in the table below. The higher the surface quality (smaller nozzle diameter and layer height) the better density and structure we obtain. The larger the nozzle and layer height, the greater the printing defects resulting in low densities after sintering.

PROTOTYPENOZZLELAYER HEIGHTDENSITY% CHARDNESS
A250 μm0,05 mm7,64 g/cc 0,03288 HV10
B400 μm0,15 mm7,60 g/cc 0,03291 HV10
C400 μm0,3 mm7,46 g/cc 0,04192 HV10
Measurements of Studio System Desktop Metal printer prototypes incl. Density / % C / Hardness
  • A
  • B
  • C

If the deformation of the prototypes is evaluated, we obtain the opposite effect. The deformation increases the smaller the nozzle and the layer height, obtaining prototypes that require subsequent straightening processes to achieveacceptable tolerances.

PROTOTYPENOZZLELAYER HEIGHTDEFORMATION/OVAL
A250 μm0,05 mm0,17 mm
B400 μm0,15 mm0,05 mm
C400 μm0,3 mm0,01 mm
Prototype measurements of the Studio System Desktop Metal Printer incl. Deformation / Oval

It is important to find a balance between the surface quality obtained and the deformation of the sintered prototype.

Finally, a relationship is established between surface quality, printing time and price for each prototype studied.   

 

  • Measurements of prototypes obtained: Nozzle and Layer Height (surface)
PROTOTYPENOZZLELAYER HEIGHTDEFORMATION / OVALCOST
A250 μm0,05 mm0,17 mm10,17 €
B400 μm0,15 mm0,05 mm9,83 €
C400 μm0,3 mm0,01 mm9,60 €
Studio System Desktop Metal Printer Prototypes measurements incl. Deformation / Oval and Cost

CONVENTIONAL FILAMENT PRINTER

Ecrimesa Group has acquired in its facilities a conventional filament printer that, like Desktop Metal’s Studio System, uses FDM printing technology but differs in that the raw material is given in the form of filament instead of bars. The manufacturing technology is also defined in this case as FFF (Fused Filament Fabrication). The advantage of this printer over the Studio System is that it is a printer with open material, i.e., it is capable of printing filaments from different suppliers, including filaments developed for specific applications and uses. For this reason, Mimecrisa has been committed to the development of filaments in collaboration with the CDTI and a technology center (stainless steels, low alloy carbon steels, superalloys, etc), for more than two years for printing prototypes and processing within its facilities, in addition to being able to use commercial filaments that already exist in the market.

BINDER JETTING AT ECRIMESA GROUP 

According to the evaluation carried out in Ecrimesa Group on the prototypes printed by Binder Jetting technology, it can be concluded that the final properties of the parts printed by this technology are the most similar to the MIM technology, if we compare the Additive Manufacturing techniques based on sintering. However, the investment required for the implementation of Binder Jetting technology is much higher than in the case of FDM technology. This is why we contemplate the subcontracting of Binder Jetting work whenever the project requires it, waiting for the technology to mature and settle before incorporating the purchase of the machinery to the group.

The following point lists some design recommendations to take into account before printing parts using Binder Jetting technology (source: www.digitalmetal.tech):

  • Maximum length: preferably <50 mm in the longest side, but permissible up to the dimensions of the print box to scale. Tamaño mínimo: 1 x 1 x 3 mm.
  • Minimum size: 1 x 1 x 3 mm.   
  • Corner R: 35 µm.  
  • Chamfer: 35 µm steps in Z direction.  
  • Resolution: 35 µm. 
  • Wall thickness: Preferably > 300 µm, up to 150 µm depending on area and design.  
  • Holes: > 200 µm.  
  • Surface quality: Ra 6 µm (without secondary operations).
Binder Jetting Technologies

CASE STUDIES BINDER JETTING PROTOTYPES  

The sintering process is one of the most critical fundamental stages of the Binder Jetting technology. The sintering cycle must be optimized for each material to obtain metal parts with the right density, carbon and deformation. Sintering in unsuitable sintering cycles can result in problems of defects, deformations, wrong shrinkage factors, incorrect properties, etc. In this sense, Ecrimesa Group has a Know-How in the sintering process consolidated during years of experience. So much so that all the sintering tests of Binder Jetting prototypes carried out in Ecrimesa Group have better results of density, carbon and deformation than the prototypes received already sintered by the suppliers of printing machines.

MATERIAL: 316L MATERIAL: 316L MATERIAL: 316L 
DENSITY% COVAL
PROVIDER 7,72-77 g/cc 0,011 0,01 mm 
MIMECRISA 7,72-77 g/cc 0,0030,01 mm 
Comparison MATERIAL: 316L
MATERIAL: 316L MATERIAL: 316L MATERIAL: 316L 
DENSITY% COVAL
PROVIDER  7,90-92 g/cc 0,011 0,20 mm 
MIMECRISA 7,87-89 g/cc 0,0070,14 mm 
Comparison MATERIAL: 316L
MATERIAL: 17-4PH MATERIAL: 17-4PH MATERIAL: 17-4PH 
DENSITY% COVAL
PROVEEDOR 7,63-65 g/cc 0,010 0,15 mm 
Comparison MATERIAL: 316L
MATERIAL: 316L MATERIAL: 316L MATERIAL: 316L 
DENSITY% COVAL
MIMECRISA7,85 g/cc 0,004 0,01 mm 
Comparison MATERIAL: 316L

At Ecrimesa Group we use Additive Manufacturing for:  

  • Manufacture of prototypes prior mold manufacturing with properties as close as possible to those obtained with MIM technology.   
  • Possibility of offering the customer design studies with prototypes prior to mold manufacturing.   
  • Acceleration of the MIM process by means of studies on prototypes (sintering positioning, sintering supports, study of deformations, defects, etc).   
  • Manufacture of short series of parts with complex geometry, whose investment in MIM molds is not appropriate due to geometric limitations or its cost.  

If you are interested in knowing more about this process:

CONTACT US

What you can read next

The characteristics of additive manufacturing and how to use it in the fabrication of metal pieces
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS of MIM vs FDM vs BINDER JETTING
Case Study: Desktop Metal Studio System

Proyecto de Innovaciones de Industria 4.0 en Mimecrisa 2021” Cofinanciado por la Consejería de Innovación, Industria, Turismo y Comercio (Gob. Cantabria) y el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER El objetivo general del proyecto es avanzar en la transformación digital de MIMECRISA mediante la aplicación de un conjunto de nuevas tecnologías que afectarán a toda la cadena de valor del proceso (para la optimización de su control y mejora continua) al producto (gracias a la reducción de errores y predicción de defectos mediante ML) y al modelo de negocio (facilitando la relación con proveedores/clientes).

La empresa Electro Crisol Metal, S.A. ha sido beneficiaria dentro del programa de SODERCAN SA: "Subvenciones en respuesta a las consecuencias económicas de la guerra de UCRANIA."
De acuerdo con lo dispuesto en el artículo 28.6 la Ley de Cantabria 1/2018, de 21 de marzo, de Transparencia de la Actividad Pública, se publica la siguiente comunicación de retribuciones.

La empresa Mimecri, S.A. ha sido beneficiaria dentro del programa de SODERCAN SA: "Subvenciones en respuesta a las consecuencias económicas de la guerra de UCRANIA."
De acuerdo con lo dispuesto en el artículo 28.6 la Ley de Cantabria 1/2018, de 21 de marzo, de Transparencia de la Actividad Pública, se publica la siguiente comunicación de retribuciones.

La empresa Mecanizados Cantabria, S.L. ha sido beneficiaria dentro del programa de SODERCAN SA: "Subvenciones en respuesta a las consecuencias económicas de la guerra de UCRANIA."
De acuerdo con lo dispuesto en el artículo 28.6 la Ley de Cantabria 1/2018, de 21 de marzo, de Transparencia de la Actividad Pública, se publica la siguiente comunicación de retribuciones.

Flag of Europe

Unión Europea

Proyecto Cofinanciado por el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional
Programa Operativo FEDER de Cantabria 2014-2020

"Una manera de hacer Europa"

Ecrimesa isotipo blanco

Avda. Parayas 32 ES-39011 Santander. España

Tel.: (+34) 942 334 511
ecrimesa@ecrimesa.es

Company

About us
History
Facilities
Quality
Commitments
Corporate Communications
Contact

Services

Investment casting
MIM
Machining
Additive manufacturing

Industries

Automotive
Aviation
Health
Defense
Other sectors

Downloads

Design Rules and Tolerances - Investment Casting
Design Rules and Tolerances - MIM
Metal Additive Manufacturing guide
MIM Process Guide
See all

© 2021 Ecrimesa. All rights reserved. Legal policies · Privacy policies · Cookies policy · Made with ❤️ by saKudarte

TOP

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

Ecrimesa Group
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Cookie Policy

More information about our Cookie Policy